Is an MCA legally a loan?

Not by its structure. But New York courts have increasingly looked past the label and examined whether the economic substance of the transaction functions as a loan. If the funder bears no real risk of loss, the transaction may be recharacterized as a loan subject to usury limits.

What makes an MCA different from a business loan?

A true MCA involves the purchase of future receivables with the funder bearing the risk that the business may not generate enough revenue. A loan involves a fixed repayment obligation regardless of business performance. The distinction matters because loans are subject to usury caps and lending regulations that MCAs are not.

What Is a Merchant Cash Advance and Is It Legally a Loan?

Q: What is a merchant cash advance?

A merchant cash advance is a transaction in which a company purchases a portion of a business's future receivables at a discount in exchange for an upfront lump sum. It is not structured as a loan, which is why MCA companies claim exemption from usury laws.

A merchant cash advance is not a loan by its legal structure. It is a purchase of future receivables. That distinction is the foundation of the entire MCA industry, and it is also the pressure point that defendants can use to fight back.

How a Merchant Cash Advance Works

In a typical MCA transaction, a funding company provides a lump sum to a business in exchange for a percentage of the business’s future credit card receipts or bank deposits. The business repays through daily or weekly automatic withdrawals from its bank account. The total repayment amount exceeds the original advance, with the difference representing the funder’s profit, typically expressed as a “factor rate” rather than an interest rate.

Why MCAs Claim to Be Exempt From Usury Laws

Because the transaction is structured as a purchase of receivables rather than a loan, MCA companies argue that usury laws do not apply. There is no “interest rate” in the traditional sense because there is no “loan.” This structural distinction has allowed the MCA industry to charge effective annual rates that can exceed 100%, 200%, or even higher without running afoul of lending regulations.

When Courts Recharacterize an MCA as a Loan

New York courts have developed a body of case law examining when an MCA should be treated as a loan despite its label. The key question is whether the funder bears a genuine risk of loss. If the MCA agreement includes a personal guarantee, a confession of judgment, a reconciliation provision that is never actually honored, or any other mechanism that effectively guarantees repayment regardless of business performance, courts may find that the transaction is a loan in substance.

If recharacterized as a loan, the transaction becomes subject to New York’s usury statutes. Civil usury caps interest at 16% per year. Criminal usury caps it at 25%. If the effective rate exceeds these thresholds, the borrower may have grounds to void the entire agreement.

What This Means for Your Defense

If you are being pursued by an MCA funder, the structure of your specific agreement matters enormously. An attorney experienced in MCA defense can analyze the agreement, identify provisions that undermine the funder’s risk-of-loss argument, and determine whether recharacterization and usury defenses are available in your case.

Need Help With This Issue?

If you are facing a situation related to mca / predatory lending defense, we can help you understand your options and build a defense strategy.

Schedule a Consultation